It does not come with optical image stabilization so they unfortunately ended up taking a lot of slightly blurry photos. In good lighting situations they were able to capture images with good detail and vibrant colors, especially in HDR mode.
When compared to camera on the Moto G 2, critics saw a marked improvement in picture quality. While the back cover of the phone is removable, the battery itself is not.Īnother big upgrade for the Moto G 3 is the 13-MP main camera. The 2,470mAh battery provided experts with a full day of battery life with moderate usage and around 2 days of very light use. The biggest selling point of the Moto G 3 isn't its performance, it is the battery life. In general, reviewers describe the performance of both models as "zippy" though they did find the 16GB version to be slightly faster in comparison. Both models come with a 1.4GHz quad-core processor and mid-level graphics processer. Naturally the one with the higher storage and RAM ends up costing more than the base version. The Moto G offers two different setups: 8GB of internal storage with 1GB of RAM or 16GB of internal storage and 2GB of RAM. With that said they found overall viewing angles and sunlight legibility fairly average with Greenbot adding, "The display has a propensity to be a bit too bright at night, which can contribute to some serious eye strain."
Still, critics were fairly satisfied with the screen overall as it provides accurate and bright colors.
#Moto x moto g3 720p
It sports the same 5-inch, 720p display as its predecessor, leading to a relatively low pixel density of 294ppi. The one thing Motorola did not upgrade for the Moto G 3 is the screen.
0 kommentar(er)
